Independent security testing for software products

Security testing that tells you which findings are real.

ZeroQuarry tests your product continuously, then tries to disprove every finding before it reaches you. What survives arrives with a reproduction and a suggested fix.

30-day trialNo credit card1 private product
case://ZQC-281illustrative
14:02:04Researcher[ZQC-281] Candidate: invoice update may skip the tenant ownership check
14:02:16Vendor[ZQC-281] Contested: middleware could enforce ownership, provide a full source-to-sink
14:02:31Researcher[ZQC-281] Revised: invoice query and update mechanism does not apply account filter
14:02:38Researcher[ZQC-281] PoC: forged tenant JWT reaches update handler · 200 OK
14:02:52Vendor[ZQC-281] Accepted: PoC reproduction validated. Claim sustained
14:03:07System[ZQC-281] Evidence report: drafted report with impact and remediation guidance
14:03:15System[ZQC-281] Opened PR #482: scope invoice lookup by account_id
14:03:44HumanMerge PR #482
14:04:02Researcher[ZQC-281] Retest: validate forged JWTs don't reach update handler
14:04:18System[ZQC-281] Evidence report: draft evidence of remediation
DETECT · CONTEST · PROVE · PATCHREVIEW IN PROGRESS
15 years of vulnerability triage at Elastic, Kong, and Vectara/ Published coordinated RCE research/ SOC 2 programs run end-to-end at four companies/ Retest-verified remediation

Seven capabilities. One loop.

Each one is a step in the same workflow, and every step writes to the same record. Start with whichever one is causing the most trouble.

Finding something is easy. Proving it is the hard part.

Automated scanners are fast and confident, and often wrong. ZeroQuarry runs a second pass that tries to break each finding, the way a vendor's security team would. If a finding cannot be reproduced, it is dropped rather than handed to your engineers.

01

A finding can be serious and still be wrong. We score severity and confidence separately, and show you the evidence for both.

02

When you dismiss a finding, the reason stays attached. Six months later, an auditor can see why.

03

Fixes arrive as pull requests under your own review, CI, and merge rules. Nothing merges itself.

How adversarial validation works
ZeroQuarry finding with evidence, review state, and decision controls

Built where real vulnerability reports land.

ZeroQuarry is built by someone who spent fifteen years deciding what to do with vulnerability reports, including which ones earned a CVE, and who ran SOC 2 audits and published coordinated RCE research. The product comes out of that work rather than a scanner's rule set.

RCE

Published coordinated research on exploitable plugin and extension ecosystems.

15Y

Security leadership and vulnerability triage at Elastic, Kong, and Vectara.

LOOP

What we learn from published research goes back into the product.

Read ZeroQuarry research
research://evidencecoordinated
CLAIMOpening untrusted Markdown reaches executable behavior

Trace the plugin path, prove reachability, and identify the affected configuration.

CHALLENGEIs execution actually reachable?

Test default state, permissions, versions, and realistic user action.

OUTCOMEFix, disclose, publish

Coordinate the maintainer response before turning the finding into public research.

public writeups follow responsible disclosure

See what ZeroQuarry finds on your product.

Run the 30-day trial on one private product: real assessments, challenged findings, verified fixes, no card required. Want a founder-assisted start instead? The founding cohort adds an initial assessment and three rescans. If that first assessment surfaces nothing new worth recording, you get the $2,000 back.