01
Disclosure-quality evidence
Review source, impact, reproduction, affected versions, and PoC before sending the claim outside the workspace.
Vulnerability disclosure
Move from an external claim to a defensible disclosure.
Validate exploitability, challenge weak claims, prepare reviewed proof and disclosure language, share only what the recipient needs, and retain the complete coordination timeline.
HackerOne contextProof and disclosure draftsDisclosure timeline
disclosure://coordinated-caseprocessing
ResearcherVendor
reportedMar 04
acknowledgedMar 06
fix shippedMar 21
embargo liftsApr 15
publishedApr 17
coordinated writeup ยท credit shared
publication follows verification and the agreed coordination window
Capabilities
A higher evidence bar than internal suspicion
A vendor, researcher, or bounty program needs a reproducible claim, clear affected scope, and a controlled communication trail. Raw model output is not enough.
02
Adversarial review
Use a vendor-style challenge and researcher rebuttal to expose weak assumptions before the real counterparty does.
03
HackerOne eligibility context
Label findings against common core-ineligible categories without silently deleting or downgrading them.
04
Draft disclosure language
Generate a starting email or report, then review the technical claims and recipient context manually.
05
Controlled shares
Deliver selected findings through password-protected, expiring, revocable read-only links.
06
Timeline tracking
Record report, acknowledgement, fix, advisory, bounty, credit, notes, and closure events.
How it runs
Validate, strengthen, prepare, coordinate
The steps between an external claim and a disclosure you can stand behind.
Validate scope
Confirm authorization, program rules, affected asset, and whether the issue is real in context.
Strengthen evidence
Reproduce safely, challenge the finding, and resolve contradictory review signals.
Prepare disclosure
Review PoC, impact, affected versions, mitigation, and the draft communication.
Coordinate
Share narrowly, track milestones, verify the fix, and close the record when appropriate.
Outcomes
Fewer weak reports reaching the public
A complete coordination record, and a higher evidence bar before anything is published.
Fewer weak external reports
Challenge non-exploitability, environment mismatch, scope, and evidence gaps before disclosure.
Safer coordination
Control what leaves the account and how long the recipient can access it.
A complete disclosure record
Keep technical evidence, communication milestones, remediation, retest, bounty, and credit together.
Evaluation FAQ
Questions about coordinating disclosure
Automated emails, platform verdicts, and whether vendors can reply inside a share.
Does ZeroQuarry send disclosure emails automatically?
It can generate draft language and send controlled share invitations, but disclosure claims and recipient details should be reviewed by a human before delivery.
Does HackerOne review decide whether we should disclose?
No. It adds context about common eligibility categories. Program rules, authorization, impact, and the evidence still determine the decision.
Can vendors respond inside a share?
Shares are read-only. Use your normal coordination channel for responses and record important milestones in the disclosure timeline.
Related workflows
Inbound reports
Coordinate one disclosure end to end
Take an existing claim through validation, evidence, and a controlled share.