01
Disclosure-quality evidence
Review source, impact, reproduction, affected versions, and PoC before sending the claim outside the workspace.
Vulnerability disclosure
Move from an external claim to a defensible disclosure.
Validate exploitability, challenge weak claims, prepare reviewed proof and disclosure language, share only what the recipient needs, and retain the complete coordination timeline.
HackerOne contextProof and disclosure draftsDisclosure timeline
disclosure://coordinated-caseprocessing
CLAIMreproducible issue
CONTACTvendor channel
TIMELINEembargo agreed
ZEROQUARRYCoordinated disclosure caseKeep proof, communication, remediation, and timing togetheractive
FIXmaintainer patch
VERIFYretest passed
PUBLISHcoordinated writeup
publication follows verification and the agreed coordination window
Capabilities
External reporting needs a higher evidence bar than internal suspicion.
A vendor, researcher, or bounty program needs a reproducible claim, clear affected scope, and a controlled communication trail. Raw model output is not enough.
02
Adversarial review
Use a vendor-style challenge and researcher rebuttal to expose weak assumptions before the real counterparty does.
03
HackerOne eligibility context
Label findings against common core-ineligible categories without silently deleting or downgrading them.
04
Draft disclosure language
Generate a starting email or report, then review the technical claims and recipient context manually.
05
Controlled shares
Deliver selected findings through password-protected, expiring, revocable read-only links.
06
Timeline tracking
Record report, acknowledgement, fix, advisory, bounty, credit, notes, and closure events.
How it runs
A concrete path through the work.
ZeroQuarry automates investigation and coordination. Your team keeps control of authorization, risk ownership, and production changes.
Validate scope
Confirm authorization, program rules, affected asset, and whether the issue is real in context.
Strengthen evidence
Reproduce safely, challenge the finding, and resolve contradictory review signals.
Prepare disclosure
Review PoC, impact, affected versions, mitigation, and the draft communication.
Coordinate
Share narrowly, track milestones, verify the fix, and close the record when appropriate.
Operational result
What the team gets back.
Useful coverage should lead to faster decisions, cleaner remediation, and evidence that holds up when someone asks for it later.
Fewer weak external reports
Challenge non-exploitability, environment mismatch, scope, and evidence gaps before disclosure.
Safer coordination
Control what leaves the account and how long the recipient can access it.
A complete disclosure record
Keep technical evidence, communication milestones, remediation, retest, bounty, and credit together.
Details
Questions that come up in evaluation.
These are the product boundaries, controls, and operating details teams usually want to understand first.
Does ZeroQuarry send disclosure emails automatically?
It can generate draft language and send controlled share invitations, but disclosure claims and recipient details should be reviewed by a human before delivery.
Does HackerOne review decide whether we should disclose?
No. It adds context about common eligibility categories. Program rules, authorization, impact, and the evidence still determine the decision.
Can vendors respond inside a share?
Shares are read-only. Use your normal coordination channel for responses and record important milestones in the disclosure timeline.
Related workflows
Continue through the operating loop.
Start with one real security boundary.
Use the free trial on your own product, then decide whether the resulting security work is useful enough to keep.