Pentest follow-through
A report lands with engineering, but validation context, remediation ownership, and retest evidence split across tools and inboxes.
A one-client delivery pilot for vCISO, compliance, penetration-testing, and software-advisory firms. You keep the customer relationship. ZeroQuarry helps carry application findings through skeptical validation, engineering decisions, remediation, retesting, and current evidence.
Bring the security trigger, assurance requirement, and relationship that make the work matter now.
Investigate, challenge, route, retest, and preserve the evidence around one product.
Complete one paid engagement before discussing a broad channel program.
Advisers often identify the requirement and pentesters identify the issue. Engineering still needs a credible way to decide, fix, verify, and answer the next customer.
A report lands with engineering, but validation context, remediation ownership, and retest evidence split across tools and inboxes.
The client needs to demonstrate a current application-security practice, not merely upload last year’s assessment PDF.
The vCISO owns the risk conversation but cannot economically operate every finding across every engineering team.
A security review asks whether findings were fixed, accepted, or retested, and the answer must be reconstructed from stale records.
The partner can implement fixes but needs independent evidence about what matters and whether the change addressed the original risk.
A security firm can keep strategic and human-testing work while ZeroQuarry handles bounded, repeatable follow-through.
The first engagement is deliberately bounded. No quotas, exclusivity, certification, or reseller infrastructure is required.
Identify one consenting client with a current pentest, compliance, customer-review, launch, or application-security trigger.
Define the authorized product, responsibilities, success criteria, commercial model, attribution, model funding, and decision date.
Assess the product, challenge findings, record human decisions, and move accepted work into the client’s engineering workflow.
Verify selected remediation and preserve the current finding, decision, fix, and retest record for the client and adviser.
Review delivery effort, client value, economics, and fit; then continue, revise the offer, or stop without channel debt.
The client’s current security or assurance trigger and the requirements the outcome must satisfy.
Client sponsorship, authorization, stakeholder context, and the advisory or testing work already in motion.
The decision about how ZeroQuarry appears: direct, bundled, subcontracted, or jointly delivered.
Product scoping, platform onboarding, assessment workflow, and transparent execution boundaries.
Adversarial validation, decision records, remediation support, selected retesting, and current evidence.
Founder involvement during the pilot and an honest final review of value, failure, economics, and next fit.
The client or partner chooses the billing path before any source, target, or customer identity is shared.
One bounded product, kickoff, baseline workflow, working review, selected retest, and final decision session.
Bring account-managed model keys, or agree a maximum hosted-usage budget before the engagement begins.
The client can continue on annual Coverage and apply the full $1,000 baseline credit, leaving $920 for the first annual subscription.
Direct, bundled, referral, and subcontracted delivery are all possible. Commercial handling, attribution, confidentiality, and responsibilities are agreed before the client introduction. No exclusivity or ongoing partner commitment is required.
Do not disclose a client’s identity or confidential details in this form. Describe the security trigger, product shape, and handoff problem well enough to test whether a joint engagement is worth a working session.
Use a paid engagement to learn whether ZeroQuarry closes the gap between your security advice and the client’s engineering outcome.