Start with the moment security becomes urgent.
The right workflow depends on the decision: merge a risky PR, ship a release, answer a researcher, satisfy a customer, or build a credible program with a lean team.
Start with a workflow your team already recognizes.
Each one combines the appropriate assessment surface, validation depth, human decision, remediation path, and evidence output.
Open source maintainers
Validate noisy vulnerability reports against public source and keep the response work together.
See the free programSecurity for growing companies
Build a credible startup security program with AI security testing, vulnerability triage, remediation, retesting, and customer evidence before hiring a large team.
See the playbookPull request security review
Pull request security scanning in GitHub Actions: changed-code review, validated findings, and an automated fix pull request opened under your normal review.
See the playbookRelease security review
Review release source, shipped artifacts, and authorized staging behavior with AI penetration testing, adversarial validation, remediation, and evidence.
See the playbookInbound vulnerability reports
Forward researcher and customer vulnerability reports into bounded AI triage that maps targets, starts assessments, preserves evidence, and routes remediation.
See the playbookCustomer and audit evidence
Answer customer security reviews and audit evidence requests with current asset reports, pentest PDFs, controlled finding shares, audit history, and retests.
See the playbookVulnerability disclosure
Validate vulnerability disclosures, generate proof and draft reports, share findings securely, track vendor timelines, and preserve remediation evidence.
See the playbookBinary security review
Run binary security tests on uploaded APK, JAR, WAR, and firmware artifacts. Deterministic version discovery, decompilation, and binary-aware agents produce findings an engineer can check.
See the playbookThe same loop, applied where security is breaking down.
Choose the pattern that matches product exposure, customer pressure, change rate, and the cost of a miss.
| Starting point | Primary concern | Starting workflow | What good looks like |
|---|---|---|---|
| Establish coverage | Do we know our critical product risk? | Source baseline and release review | Important findings have a decision and one fix has been retested. |
| Operate continuously | Can security keep up with delivery? | PR review, schedules, issue routing | Security work moves through engineering without a separate manual program. |
| Standardize and prove | Can we execute consistently and prove it? | Lifecycle, adversarial review, evidence packs | Assets, decisions, remediation, exceptions, and retests are traceable. |
Which one is costing you the most time?
Start there. Once one workflow is giving you clear decisions, adding the next one is easy.