Start with the moment security becomes urgent.
The right workflow depends on the decision: merge a risky PR, ship a release, answer a researcher, satisfy a customer, or build a credible program with a lean team.
Start with a workflow your team already recognizes.
Each one combines the appropriate assessment surface, validation depth, human decision, remediation path, and evidence output.
Open source maintainers
Validate noisy vulnerability reports against public source and keep the response work together.
See the free programSecurity for growing companies
Build a credible startup security program with AI security testing, vulnerability triage, remediation, retesting, and customer evidence before hiring a large team.
See the playbookPull request security review
Run AI pull request security reviews in GitHub Actions, focus on changed code, validate findings, open remediation work, and retest merged fixes.
See the playbookRelease security review
Review release source, shipped artifacts, and authorized staging behavior with AI penetration testing, adversarial validation, remediation, and evidence.
See the playbookInbound vulnerability reports
Forward researcher and customer vulnerability reports into bounded AI triage that maps targets, starts assessments, preserves evidence, and routes remediation.
See the playbookCustomer and audit evidence
Answer customer security reviews and audit evidence requests with current asset reports, pentest PDFs, controlled finding shares, audit history, and retests.
See the playbookVulnerability disclosure
Validate vulnerability disclosures, generate proof and draft reports, share findings securely, track vendor timelines, and preserve remediation evidence.
See the playbookThe same loop, applied where security is breaking down.
Choose the pattern that matches product exposure, customer pressure, change rate, and the cost of a miss.
| Starting point | Primary concern | Starting workflow | What good looks like |
|---|---|---|---|
| Establish coverage | Do we know our critical product risk? | Source baseline and release review | Important findings have a decision and one fix has been retested. |
| Operate continuously | Can security keep up with delivery? | PR review, schedules, issue routing | Security work moves through engineering without a separate manual program. |
| Standardize and prove | Can we execute consistently and prove it? | Lifecycle, adversarial review, evidence packs | Assets, decisions, remediation, exceptions, and retests are traceable. |
Which security moment is consuming the most time?
Start there. ZeroQuarry can expand into the rest of the operating loop once one workflow is producing clear decisions and verified outcomes.